Every piece of street art is temporary. It exists on a wall for a while then disappears. All that remains are
photos that circulate the Internet. It is an example of the precarious in art that signifies a transient, uncertain, state that is in contrast to established or stable ones. The ephemeral nature of street art acts to defy or subvert traditional views of fine art.
Thankfully, street art is no longer seen as vandalism of private property. Its
visual creativity, which is increasingly being infused with graphic design, is now recognised to have emerged from outside the establishment of the contemporary art institution.
CDH in
Paint Wars: Graffiti v street art says that there has been an ever widening gap between street art and graffiti; graffiti has remained oppositional while street art has drifted to become the most mainstream contemporary art practice.
This position holds that street art is increasingly populated with artists whose ambitions are to secure good gallery representation, whilst graffiti culture has no such aspiration.
CDH's argument is that commercial street art heavily trades on the street cred of the outlaw persona that accompanies it, but writing largely paid the price for this credibility. Writers are the ones breaking into train yards and going to prison, while street artists are putting up legal murals or token stencils in back laneways and occasionally having their work buffed.
Read more